Following are some overall issues policymakers may want to address (many of which Oregon has
already addressed) when considering a P-16 policy initiative:
-
Is there a universal pre-kindergarten system in the state? Are children ready to
learn when they enter K-12? Is there agreement on what school readiness looks
like? Is there adequate funding for pre-kindergarten?
-
Are pre-kindergarten teachers and caregivers professionalized and given adequate
salaries?
-
Does the state provide [or offer] full-day kindergarten?
-
How can colleges and universities align their policies and practices with K-12
standards and assessments?
-
How can the state use its K-12 assessments to determine students' readiness for
postsecondary instruction?
-
Why and under what conditions should postsecondary institutions provide
remedial instruction?
-
How can colleges of education be encouraged to produce teachers with the
skills needed to lead diverse classrooms?
-
How can the state create a flexible, responsive system of lifelong learning?
How can it help keep learners' skills current in the warp speed of the new
economy?
-
What incentives are available to hasten the change to a seamless P-16 system
of education?
Consider all current and future Oregon state policies through the P-16 vision by
asking: Will this policy
-
Contribute to achieving our vision of a P-16 system?
-
Improve student achievement for all learners?
-
Improve access and equity in the public schools?
-
Contribute to reductions in remedial education rates?
-
Improve transfer and articulation policies and procedures?
-
Enhance teacher quality?
-
Increase alignment of curricula and assessments across levels?
-
Enhance the provision of early learning for all children?
-
Have a positive effect on education finance?
-
Require new governance structures?
Source: Center for Community College Policy (XX) Building Bridges Not Barriers.
Boswell, Katherine. Denver, CO.
|