Teacher Quality - Title II-A
Educator Effectiveness Toolkit - Observation & Evidence
Educator Effectiveness Toolkit - Observation & Evidence
Educator Effectiveness Toolkit
FAQs & Guidance
Standards for Practice
Student Learning & Growth
Observation & Evidence
Peer Review Process
District Collaboration Grants
District Examples & Models
Ed Effectiveness Home
Multiple Measures - Observation & Evidence
A comprehensive evaluation system must include a variety of evidence-based measures to evaluate teacher and administrator performance and effectiveness, based on standards of professional practice. Multiple measures provide a more comprehensive view of the educator’s practice and contribution to student growth. Due to the complex nature of teaching and administrator practice, a single measure does not provide sufficient evidence to evaluate performance. When combined, multiple measures provide a body of evidence that informs the educator’s evaluation resulting in a more accurate and valid judgment about performance and professional growth needs.
The evaluation system must include a variety of evidence-based measures to evaluate teacher and administrator performance and effectiveness, based on the Oregon Model Core Teaching Standards and the Educational Leadership/Administrator Standards. To provide a balanced view of performance, evaluations of all teachers and building administrators must include evidence from the following three categories: (A) Professional Practice, (B) Professional Responsibilities, and © Student Learning and Growth.
Oregon Matrix Model for Educator Evaluation (Word)
Examples from Oregon Districts
Observation Evidence Collection Tool
This template is provided for the purpose of collecting evidence during a classroom observation.
CCSS Evidence Guides: CCSS Aligned Practice Made Clear
These tools provide specific guidance for what the CCSS for ELA/literacy and math looks like in planning and practice. They are designed as developmental tools for teachers and those who support teachers.
Sample Artifact Rubric (Missouri)
This sample rubric represents a method of examining a teacher’s professional artifacts to determine how effective that teacher’s planning and preparation have been, and to determine whether the teacher has obtained the necessary credentials to serve in his or her role. Please note that the following rubric does not explain how a district might incorporate a teacher’s performance on the rubric into his or her overall evaluation results. This is merely an example of one way to measure a teacher’s preparation and credentialing.
Templates for Gathering Artifacts (Teachers)
Templates for Gathering Artifacts (Administrators)
Oregon Administrator Rubric
Artifacts 101: The Role of Artifacts in Educator Evaluation
This PowerPoint provides basic information on the kinds of evidence that are considered artifacts and the role of artifacts in the evaluation cycle. Facilitator notes are included.
Artifacts 101 Webinar
Videos - Gathering Evidence
This series of four training videos filmed during the Round 2 Workshop Series will walk you through gathering evidence towards standards of practice from multiple measures including observation and artifact analysis, gathering evidence towards completion of goals, and creating an evidence base to help facilitate a more objective and balanced formative and summative evaluation process.
Gathering Evidence PPT
Videos - Observations & Feedback
This series of three training videos filmed during the Round 2 Workshop series will walk you through the observation and feedback process that is essential to gathering evidence for a professional growth and evaluation system.
Observations and Feedback Calibration PPT
The materials listed here are designed to provide background information on this piece of the educator effectiveness system and include reasearch-based resources that have been vetted at the national level.
Seven Keys to Effective Feedback (ASCD)
Whether feedback is just there to be grasped or is provided by another person, helpful feedback is goal-referenced; tangible and transparent; actionable; user-friendly (specific and personalized); timely; ongoing; and consistent.
Key Considerations When Measuring Teacher Effectiveness
This report from the Assessment and Accountability Comprehensive Center (AACC) is intended to highlight the range of data sources that can be tapped to validate teacher effectiveness. The discussion of Data Levels I & II are most relevant to this section.
Leadership for Learning: A Research-based Model and Taxonomy of Behaviors
In this article the knowledge base of leadership for learning is captured under eight major dimensions: vision for learning, instructional program, curricular program, assessment program, communities of learning, resource acquisition and use, organizational culture, and advocacy.
Learning Focused Leadership and Leadership Support in Urban Systems
This publication synthesizes three reports on the role of the central office, and principals and other school leaders in improving instruction. Among the key leadership practices it cites: making it clear that improving instruction is the “main business of the school and district.”
Guiding Questions For Professional Practice
Guiding Questions For Professional Responsibilities
Educator Effectiveness - Director
Educator Effectiveness - Education Specialist
Educator Effectiveness - Ed. Specialist, Instructional Resources
Educator Effectiveness - Education Program Specialist
Educator Effectiveness - Educator Effectiveness Specialist
Having problems finding something?
Oregon Department of Education
255 Capitol Street NE Salem, OR 97310-0203
(503) 947-5600 | Fax: (503) 378-5156
General ODE Questions:
(e.g. accessibility, nondiscrimination) |
Copyright © 1998-2015 Oregon Department of Education